What the Pope Said about Leadership – according to Harvard Business Review

Before I tell you what the Pope said, I have to give you a little bit of context. In the world of management theory, Professor John Kotter is a very important writer. He is an expert on leadership, change and strategy. In one of his acclaimed publications “Leading Change” (2007), Kotter sets out eight failures of leadership which result in failed strategy. These are summarised below:

Error #1: Not establishing a great enough urgency;

Error #2: Not creating a powerful enough coalition;

Error #3: Lacking a vision;

Error #4: Under communicating the vision by a factor of 10;

Error #5: Not removing obstacles to the new vision;

Error #6: Not systematically planning for and creating short-term wins;

Error #7: Declaring victory too soon;

Error #8: Not anchoring changes in the Corporation’s culture.

These are quite self-explanatory, and many of us have seen examples of all these failings in our careers and perhaps even in ourselves.

As an aside, you can access up to 5 articles in Harvard Business Review for free (https://hbr.org/), so you can read more about Kotter there. Also, if you are not familiar with Google Scholar, you might want to try it: just Google “Google Scholar”. From Google Scholar, you can see all the academic literature on the topic you have searched, and often pdf’s of the literature can be directly downloaded from there.

You might think that the characteristics of Failed Leadership are something which one would expect to remain constant over the years, for example, applying the list above to military campaigns would probably predict their success or failure.

However, the most popular article in April’s Harvard Business Review is “The Fifteen Diseases of Leadership, According to Pope Francis” (Hemel, 2015). Hemel says these are as relevant to the corporate world as they are to the administration of the Catholic Church.   You can see Hemel’s full article here: http://hbr.org/2015/04/the-15-diseases-of-leadership-according-to-pope-francis

The “fifteen diseases” are listed below:

  • Thinking we are immortal, immune, or downright indispensable;
  • Excessive busy-ness;
  • Mental and emotional “petrification” – forgetting the human side;
  • Excessive planning and functionalism;
  • Poor coordination – losing touch with their work communities and teams;
  • “Leadership Alzheimer’s disease” – forgetting those who helped you on the way;
  • Rivalry;
  • Existential schizophrenia – those who are hypocritical in the persona they present in their work;
  • Gossiping, grumbling, and back-biting;
  • Idolizing superiors;
  • Indifference to others;
  • Downcast face;
  • Hoarding;
  • Closed circles – clique-loving;
  • Extravagance and self-exhibition.

Perhaps the diseases of leadership, lead to the errors of the strategist, laid out by Kotter.

There is plenty of food for thought anyway.

Good leadership is so important, from friends, to family to a small company to a giant organisation, the essence of the organistation comes from the leaders. We need better leaders and we are all leaders in our own little way, hopefully you will see something here, that speaks to you, that nudges you in a direction you want to go.

 

Hi Big Brother – come on in to my life….

That’s what you say, every time you search the internet, every time you post on social media.

In short, there is very little privacy.  If you dont believe me, listen to Edward Snowden (interview with Edward Snowden on Last Week Tonight, US TV show):

There are two issues which have come to the fore since technology has brought us into the cloud with gmail, hotmail etc and social networks, and cloud music and books, and so on: Privacy and Trust.

And mostly, we don’t care.  We don’t read the privacy policies, which in fact, mostly tell you that you have invited Big Brother onto your computer to monitor all your cyber activity and in fact they might bring another few spies (third party cookies) with them.

We just need to understand that, and we also need to make sure that those around us, especially children posting on social networks understand that.

Trust is interesting because at the beginning of any sort of engagement, we have a default level of trust.  Depending on our personal characteristics, we are trusting or not so trusting, so things happen to raise or lower our trust levels.   If we make a transaction on the internet, and our sensitive financial data, for example is stolen then our trust in the internet and especially in the business involved will diminish.

Its not just our financial data we need to worry about, it could be medical records, social security records, or work records, so it is important to look for Trust certificates, and to demand that digital business continually invests in improved security – the least we can hope for is a best effort.

Are You Somebody?

Are you a digital somebody?

I can tell you now, that if you don’t tweet, and facebook, and whatsapp and all those things, then in the eyes of marketers, you are nobody.

But read on – it is not actually hard to be “somebody” in this world, and some of the people who belong to the marketer’s empire don’t know it, and perhaps people outside of this world want their opinions to count.

Since the beginning of the last century, marketing has been a “thing”. Companies used marketer’s to wrap their “products” – from actual packaging, to ads, to values, stories and changes to the products themselves. To do this marketers needed to understand what people wanted.

So there were questionnaires, and focus groups and opinion panels. Huge companies specialised in gathering all the information about what consumers want and think. As products became global products, these companies, like McKinsey, became global companies.

But now social media and very clever use of technology, is taking the manpower, and the man (and woman) out of this equation. The marketing just world counts your clicks.

One company specialising in this technology, uses software that combs through 30 million websites a day in many languages. They look for references on social media (Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Blogs, etc) to specific companies, events or products. They use software robots to crawl through text and even photos to pick up references relevant to their clients, and then sell that information to their clients, to inform them about what customers like and don’t like, what they want and what they don’t want.

The information that is searched through is all publicly available. It is all information which we put out there, every time we offer an opinion or “Like”, it is fodder for the marketing robots.

Opinion Leaders

So the marketing world garners opinions from the activities of social media users. But that’s not all – they can pick up which social media users are actually influencers.

Influencers or opinion leaders are then targeted deliberately by marketers – and courted – for example with free samples or invitations to special events, so that they will broadcast positive feedback on social media, and the marketing job is done at a very low cost.

So how do “they”, the marketing robots, know who is an influencer? This blog has a relatively small audience, but I am 100% certain, that some of the readers are “opinion leaders” about the arts, about technology, about restaurants. You might not know that you are an opinion leader, but the marketing software can see how many people liked your comment on a product for example, then acted in some way to follow your advice – by going to a site related to the product and then commenting about a similar purchase. If people follow your advice – the ‘bots will know – but only if you exist in the social media stratosphere.

This brings me to another interesting point. Do you want to know how much influence you have on facebook or Twitter? Well that’s eay to find out, there are free packages which tell you.

Klout

One of those is Klout. Google it, register (just put in your Facebook or Twitter details) and you will get a score between 1 and 100. Apparently the average is 40. My score was 10 (which I suspect might be the minimum).

klout

This doesn’t surprise me, because I find social media, socially challenging. I don’t want to tell people who I don’t know what I think (I don’t mind so much on this forum – we are an exclusive little group, and if you are still reading at this point, you are probably in a very exclusive little group!) I don’t particularly want to change this, but if I did, Klout and other similar products would help me to do that.

Now I have mentioned Klout 5 times – that should be good for an extra point on the Klout scale.

I don’t think I care that marketers don’t know what I want and don’t want, but all this makes me think that the future offerings from businesses is just going to be based on the likes and dislikes of those who live in the social media empire. That’s not a good thing.

Is Income Inequality the Source of All Our Woes?

So, there are two English Epidemiologists and one day they set about comparing differences between low salaries and high salaries in lots of different countries, and then to check if there were more social problems in the countries with bigger differences in icome. Guess what, the graphs don’t lie: big differences income, lead to higher rates f social problems.

Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett published a book of their findings in 2010, “The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone”. It is indeed a rare event when an academic style book written by epidemiologists becomes a best seller. The authors presented their work in Trinity College Dublin last November, and their story of social malaise is compelling.

 I know many of you will struggle to persuade yourself to read on but I urge you to keep reading. I felt I had been let in on a huge secret underpinning a lot of the sadness and social unrest throughout our society.

Book reviews for The Spirit Level::

‘A big idea, big enough to change political thinking’, The Guardian

 ‘A remarkable new book … the implications are profound’, Will Hutton, Observer

 ‘The evidence is hard to dispute’ The Economist

 Life Expectancy

The first charts showed that life expectancy does not correlate with National Income except at very low levels of National Income.

However, as further graphical representations showed, life expectancy is strongly correlated with income within rich countries, that is, for a specific country, the lower an individual’s income is, the lower will be his life expectancy.

How much Richer are the top 20%?

How much richer are the richest 20% than the poorest 20%? The biggest gaps are seen in Singapore and the US, the smallest gaps are seen in Japan, Finland and Norway. Ireland is about half-way along the spectrum.

 

Are Health and Social problems  caused by the gap between richer and poorer?

The question asked by Wilkinson and Pickett was: are health and social problems worse in more unequal countries.

The graphs showed a very strong link between life expectancy and the difference between the richest 20%  and the poorest 20% of the population in lots of countries.

What about the children?

For children: the graph showed that the bigger the relative difference in income is, the lower the Unicef Child Well-being Index.

Professor Wilkinson said the issue is one of “social position”. He said that research shows that people in more unequal countries trust each other less.

 Homicide Rates

A graph of homicide rates against Income Inequality for the Unites States and Canada was stark, showing much lower homicide rates for Canada than the US, which has a much bigger inequality gap.

 Lost Community =Lost Trust

Research in Mexico has shown that a withdrawal from community life (symbolised by the ubiquitous prevalence of barbed wired) indicates a withdrawal from community life and a fall in trust.

Prisoners

Further research shows that imprisonment rates are higher and a harsher penal system exists in countries with higher Income Inequality, with Japan and the lowest end of the spectrum and the USA at the highest and worst end of the spectrum.

 Infant Deaths

Similar graphs were shown for Infant deaths per 1000 births, for teenage birth rates and for social mobility.

The Boy Did Good…

Upward social mobility, is a fancy term for improving one’s lot from generation to generation, is represented by a son’s ability to move to a higher social strata than his father. Denmark and Japan were among the countries where upward social mobility opportunities were good, the US was half-way along the spectrum and South Africa and Brazil were the worst performers.

Professor Wilkinson said that the benefits of greater equality are not confined to the poor but extend to all social classes.

 The Impact of Higher Parental Education

Statistics also demonstrate that parents’ education level directly correlates children’s literacy levels. However, the extent of correlation varies, so for example, there is a bigger connection (ie children’s literacy is more impacted by parent’s education standard) in the US than in Sweden.

Professor Wilkinson stated that Income ranking predicts mental distress, not “income”. It is an issue of relativity not an absolute issue.

In South America HIV rates rise as income inequality rises.

Cancer Rates

Considering the causes of death in the US: for breast cancer and prostate cancer, there is no connection, but for murder and heart disease there is a strong connection.

The problem for the US is getting worse  ……

It is interesting to note that after World War II, the US had low income inequality and low scoring for social ills while Japan was the opposite. Now these positions have absolutely reversed. The US is suffering socially and income differences are huge.

A Different Kind of Equality of Opportunity

Social cohesion is fundamental to a healthy society. This challenges the American notion of equality of opportunity being a fundamental goal. It is suggested that there is a thinking in the US which is that social failures are related to different ethnic backgrounds but this is not the case. For example studies of “white only” populations disprove this argument.

There have been little changes in equality for the African American population in recent years, but there have been huge changes in migration patterns for the Spanish population. This ethnic group tend to have good health, this is known as the “Hispanic Paradox”.

The research shows that a lack of respect, discrimination, prejudice all lead to poverty and deprivation.

Why are we so Sensitive to Inequality?

The bigger the difference in incomes, the more issues arise with regard to class and status – the higher the social pyramid, the more that class becomes an issue, society becomes more hierarchical and the quality of social relations deteriorates.

Bullying

There are no figures for adults and bullying. So figures for bullying of children are considered: Sweden has a low bullying rate and low income inequality while the USA has high income inequality and high bullying rates.

Stress

Fibrinogen levels in the blood measurements can be used to assess stress levels in men and women at different employment grades.

More junior staff have higher stress levels and women have more bursts of stress.

Interestingly, women seek out partners with more masculinised features in more unequal societies.

Risk Factors for Psycho-Social problems are:

  • Low social status
  • Weak social connections
  • Stress in early life (pre- and post-natally).

An underlying common thread in psycho-social problems is: feeling insecure, feeling not valued, lost friendship, more status-based judgement by society, and the loss of community is exacerbating this.

Cortisol is also a measure of stress and it has been shown that stress around social issues is much higher than for other stresses.

Status

Literacy was measured in a study in India in two groups: one where it was known who was lower caste and who was from a lower caste and one where the group was mixed and it was impossible to tell which cast people were from. Where the cast was unknown, the lower caste performed better than the higher caste. Where the higher caste knew they were the higher caste they performed significantly better and the lower caste performed significantly worse than they did in the mixed group.

A sense of entitlement goes a long way!

 

Spending

The more unequal a society is, the more will be spent on higher status cars. Data from Google also indicates more expenditure on designer fashion in countries which are more unequal and more searches for cooking recipes in countries which have more equal income.

Studies show that inequality also correlates with household debt, working longer hours, depression and rising narcissism.

 

The Holy Grail

This was it, the Holy Grail, the moment of truth, the lifting of the veil, an explanation of why, when our poor have so much, compared to the poor in developing countries, they are still very, very poor. This presentation was factual, it was uncontroversial, graph after graph spelled out the effects of inequality.

I hope the knowledge and insight I was given will travel and that all those in power from the CEO of a two-man company, to prime-ministers, to the Boards of companies employing thousands begins to understand that Income Inequality is bad for all of us:

You cannot pay your highest earners hundreds of times what you pay your lowest earners and expect to get away with it.

 

 

 

The Power of the Game for Pretend Doctors

I work as a Clinical Engineer, a part of that role is in providing technical support for electrically powered medical equipment and devices. One area in which I work is in an Eye Clinic.

When we work in specific technology areas, as Clinical Engineers we are often very involved with instruments that are not perhaps electronic and that do not fit strictly into the realm of clinical engineering. We often find ourselves in discussions with clinicians regarding problem-solving for particular tricky procedures. A deeper understanding of the clinical procedures may be useful.

In among the endless discussion of the merits of various video games, my 11-year old son described to me how to insert a pacemaker. It was really quite impressive. So I followed up, and I have just removed a cartoon cataract – using instruments I have often discussed but was not fully familiar with their function. My son advises me that I can also do laser surgery.

The game has just invited me to do heart surgery.

These games are free, they are simplistic but they offer a very valuable modern tool to Clinical Engineers, perhaps young people thinking about a career in healthcare, and anyone who might be having one of these procedures. I just googled: Eye Surgery Game to find games, and one leads to another.

These games obviously provide absolutely no medical training but they are great for helping you understand procedures which you or a friend or relative may need to undergo.

But they are also fun and represent another little light-hearted benefit the internet has brought us.

Socially Responsible Corporations. Really?

Often the Private Sector hurls abuse at public sector workers – they are too well paid, they have fat pensions, they are lazy and ineffective. I am a public sector worker. Am I financially better off than I would have been in the private sector –debatable. I am not lazy, and I am reasonably effective in my work. But just as the Private Sector has these biases against public sector workers, I have biases against the corporate sector, and in particular big business.

I have a nagging feeling that business is all about separating the little people from their money. I know this is a contradictory viewpoint from someone doing a Masters in Business. Equally, I know very conscientious, very generous, and very “good” individuals working in the corporate world.

Readers from the corporate world are probably familiar with the world of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), I was not until recently.

Three things fundamental to a successful business:

I have learned that there are three things (probably a million more too, but lets stick with the three) that are fundamental to a successful business:

  • A good team (even if that team is your brother, sister, husband or wife or a thousand employees);
  • A strategy that allows you to: either do different things to your competitors, or do the same things differently to provide customer value;
  • Careful management.

Big companies need investors, and one of the ways companies try to stand out from other companies to attract investors is through Corporate Social Responsibility.

Annual Reports of these companies include CSR sections. I have read several of these. Some outline real projects, others seem to tick boxes, but clearly it is becoming an increasingly important part of the corporate role.

Some companies hold CSR very close to their hearts. Their CSR ethos underlies many of their decisions, thus trying to produce a win-win situation with their employees, with their business neighbours or community, their investors and with governments.

Corporate Citizenship

In the United States, Corporate Social Responsibility is often referred to as Corporate Citizenship.

There are 4 main pillars of Corporate Social Responsibility or Corporate Citizenship: economics, ethics, legal and philanthropic.

Some interesting examples of CSR come from Intel Ireland, through the following examples below:

  • They proactively support their staff by investing in on-going education and professional development;
  • They offer a service where a family meal can be ordered for collection at the end of work-shifts so that working parents do not have to spend tiem with their families cooking, and so enhancing quality family time;
  • They invested in conservation of the land surrounding their factory and in working with local communities in doing this;
  • They support second and third level entrepreneurship competitions encoraging next generation Intel-ites.

Reading about Kingspan, an Irish company which designs and manufactures next generation building products is working towards very green factories of its own using green power and limited CO2 emissions.

Philanthropy

Philanthropy is a very interesting aspect of Corporate Citizenship. Philanthropic donations are not subject to tax. The donor can decide who should be the recipient. The donor may or may not capitalise on the PR provided.

Philanthropic giving is fascinating.

There are philanthropists who, like Chuck Feeney who established the Atlantic Philanthropies is genuinely all about the giving. Chuck Feeney cashed in his wealth and established a plan to give his riches away, mostly to Ireland to be invested in education and to Vietnam to be invested in Healthcare. Chuck Feeney is retirred, he is not in business – he is just giving.

Denis O’Brien is famous for giving too, but he is still in business and the good PR from giving, performs a useful function in countering any bad PR, which has been known to surface from time to time.

I am aware of another company which supported philanthropic activities in an emerging country with the intention of securing licenses for drilling for oil.

Then there is the totally cynical donor, who gives to advertise – nothing more, nothing less. I read of a chain of chicken diners in the US, where the owner sponsored development of all playgrounds and sports pitches atound his diners and it had a very positive impact on his business.

This brings me to the key question about philanthropy:

If you do a good thing for the wrong reasons, does it negate the wrong thing?

The answer, I think, is “No”.

So one final point on philanthropy. How come the companies get to decide who they give their money to? Maybe the money would be more usefully used if directly invested in a given economy. That’s not going to happen though but it would be good to dream of a society driven to do good at all levels for the right reasons.

We are the customers. Maybe some of you are even investors. We should raise our voices and encourage CSR and nudge it in the direction of a better world in terms of education, healthcare, income disparity and the environment – good things for good reasons!

Educate Yourself, Just a Little Bit More – For Free

Everything is expensive, but a new approach to education, is providing an opportunity to access high quality education at little or no cost.  Technology is now providing us with educational opportunities that a very short time ago were unimaginable.

Imagine the possibility of doing a course on Healthcare Innovation with Harvard University staff, without having to relocate or leave your job, free (or very cheap) and certified. Well, that and much more, is the reality of today.

Edx.org is one way of accessing courses such as this. EdX offers interactive online classes and MOOCs from the world’s best universities. Online courses from MITx, HarvardX, BerkeleyX, UTx and many other universities. Topics include biology, business, chemistry, computer science, economics, finance, electronics, engineering, food and nutrition, law, math, medicine, music, philosophy, physics, science, statistics and more. EdX is a non-profit online initiative created by founding partners Harvard and MIT.

What is a “MOOC”

A MOOC is a Massive Open Online Course. It is an online course aimed at unlimited participation and open access via the web. In addition to traditional course materials such as videos, readings, and problem sets, MOOCs provide interactive user forums that help build a community for students, professors, and teaching assistants (TAs). MOOCs are a recent development in distance education which began to emerge in 2012.

A little bit of background from Wikipedia: “Galway based online education provider ALISON is often cited in industry literature as the first MOOC, pioneering the systematic aggregation of online interactive learning resources made available worldwide with a “freemium” model. Its stated objective is to enable people to gain basic education and workplace skills. Contrary to other MOOC providers with close links to American third level institutions such as MIT and Stanford University, the majority of ALISON’s learners are located in the developing world with the fastest growing number of users in India. It records 1.2 million unique visitors per month with 250,000 graduates of its 500+ courses as of January 2013. In February 2014, ALISON registered its 3 millionth user.

 

On-going formalised education is not for everyone but there are opportunities to build your education portfolio whether through little chunks or big bites. There are over 180 courses available on EdX. For example, you can study Musculoskeletal Anatomy, Introductory Physics — Part 1: Mechanics and Waves, Introduction to Biomedical Imaging or even, The Science of Happiness.

Education is changing. Universities offer an experience which is about broadening horizons, learning to construct the right questions, framing arguments, considering correct answers, opening one’s mind to new ideas. Arguably, education is about the process, not just the outcome, the journey, not just the destination. The communication of knowledge is just a part of that process but a fundamental part which is now made available to us all.

Many of us have a thirst for more education, many of our jobs require us to re-educate and constantly up-skill ourselves. We are frustrated about funding and time but we have an opportunity here to access knowledge and access teaching support for free and at times that may suit us. This does not replace a university educational experience but provides an opportunity to learn and to access education to a stated, and in some cases, certified level.

Example: Innovating in Healthcare

This course, Innovating in Healthcare, is available on Edx.org.  The duration is 11 weeks with an estimated effort of 6 to 12 hours per week. It is free to access all of the course material, tests, and the online discussion forum. You decide what and how much you want to do.

For this course it is not possible to receive a Verified Certificate of Achievement. Verified Certificates of Achievement are advisable if you want to use your achievement on this course as part of your portfolio for a job application or promotion, this is an advisable option and would cost arround $150 (€110). Edx are working to make Verified Certificates of Achievement available for more courses.

Innovating in Health Care (IHC) enables participants to meet and interact with others who are also interested in improving health care. The course focuses on evaluating and crafting business models that attain alignment between an entrepreneurial health care venture and the six factors that critically shape new health care ventures – Financing, Structure, Public Policy, Consumers, Technology, and Accountability. Innovating in Health Care discusses the impact of these factors on business models for three different kinds of innovations: consumer-focused, technology-driven, and integrations which create scale.

Final Word

Technology constantly challenges but constantly throws up new opportunities. Edx.org has over 180 courses, ALISON offers over 800 courses.

While this article is weighted towards learning in the healthcare field, you study just about anything (from Irish to Plumbing to statistics) with ALISON, see http://alison.com/learn/.

Finally, we have options for affordable learning.

(by Meabh Smith, originally published in the BEAI Spectrum, Summer, 2014)

Entrepreneurship for all…

A Touch of Innovation:

Dr Jim Stikeleather, Dell Services Champion of Innovation spoke at
Launch of a new Innovation Executive Breakout Programme in
Trinity College Dublin, 22nd October, 2014

“An Ideas Factory”

Dr Barry McMahon, introducing Dr Stikeleather, talked about the concept of an “ideas factory” – where ideas are the input and innovation is the output. Innovation can be in the form of products, services and processes.

He noted that children are born innovators, and yet innovation in the adult population is limited. Barry explored the reasons for this:

  • Fear of Failure
  • Fear of being thought of as stupid
  • Not able to follow through because of business and distraction
  • Fear that the idea will not be accepted by staff or colleagues
  • The idea might be your big secret, the one you know would have been better than everyone else’s.

Dr McMahon said,

We need to reclaim our creative confidence, it’s about using tools to design thinking and using building blocks to create: education, work, the regulatory system.

Barry’s suggested inputs into the Ideas Factory are:

  • New multidisciplinary collaboration
  • New networks
  • New Tools
  • Start small, think big
  • Lead by example
  • Review and change organisational culture to drive rapid innovation.

Dr Jim Stikeleather

Stikeleather has over 25 years of experience in ICT design for business and he sees the future very much in the hands of business process innovations.

He began by asking the audience to consider waking on a morning when all the things that had brought you success were gone. It would be scary but it would be the ultimate opportunity to innovate:

  • New products and services
  • Re-invent old products and services that are not working any more, or get rid of them
  • Develop new business, operational and management models

– it would be a brave new world.

Now there would be new multi-disciplinary workgroups, new networks, the market would be disrupted. It would be simultaneously exciting and scary.

This would be an opportunity to assemble our capabilities and resources, to transform old ideas into new value.

Dell – Taking Stock

Stikeleather has worked with Dell for 4 years. He is a serial entrepreneur who has failed several times but succeeded many times.

Dell was in trouble and had to change what it was doing. So Dell analysed Dell and Dell analysed society, working with many different groups including Harvard Business Review and Forbes to diagnose the fault in Dell.

They found that the big change in business was that employees were living by a “Bring your own device” model, and with this comes many challenges.

Stikeleather said that for hundreds of years, the purpose of a company was to create new customers and to achieve efficiency.

But the reality of business is that there are high process costs which are not related to the product. So the priority then becomes about assembling new capabilities and resources into new forms of value and that requires efficacy and innovation. This falls into the area of disruptive innovation.

According to Stikeleather, there are five pillars of disruption:

1. The nature of capitalism
Capital is becoming democratised, for example the Grameen Bank (see blog https://nextgenerationnotions.wordpress.com/ ).

There is a new definition of value. Until about two years ago, the focus of commerce was on Return on Investment (ROI). About that time, the Harvard Business Review had an article saying that ROI is like a peacock’s tail feathers, where evolution has made the trophy of the tail feathers a hindrance in every day life, this is an unintended consequence. The peacock can no longer survive in the wild, can ROI continue as the driver of commercial decisions. Stikeleather and Meyer and Kirby (2012), say not, in fact there is a new definition of value: social investment.

2. A realisation that we cannot do everything any more.

A single business with many specialties cannot fulfill every function. Stikeleather posed the following three questions:

  • This minute, am I creating value for my customer?
  • Am I the best in the world at doing this?
  • Am I doing this for regulatory reasons?

Stikeleather says if you answer no to any of these questions, then it is time to consider splitting the company.

3. Disruptions, especially technological enable other disruptions across the elements of time, space, information and access.

We are all aware of the rate of change of technology and the world it touches on a daily basis.

4. Economics
Our fundamental assumptions are wrong. That is, our assumptions around supply and demand might be wrong because we have assumed that decision makers are rational, but they may not be, especially if we consider the approach of the ROI investor.

– Mathematicians are now involved in Business
System scientists are developing system economics, they are challenging old models of economics.

Economics emerges from individual behaviours. We need to simplify this, so that most profit is a function of fiction-transaction costs:

  • Information differential between the buyer and the seller (eg access to internet product reviews).
  • Access to capital such as micro-lending and Kickstart – ideas no longer depend on banks and venture capitalists.
  • Time: changed by the internet – communications can be instantaneous.
  • Distance: the internet, technology, logistics, clever distribution chains all lessen the impact of distance – (for example: DHL, FedEx and UPS).

One very easy source of profit is to have a monopoly. A monopoly can arise when a service or product is provided to government which they need but which no one else can offer; a value proposition, based on innovation (and indeed serial innovation) is offered to all when the product, process or service cannot be offered by anyone else.

Stikeleather gave a glimpse of the brave new world we are living in:

  • Two men go fishing in a little rowing boat;
  • One suggests they can catch more fish by modifying the reels to cast faster and reel in faster;
  • They return home, access some open source reel designs on the internet, make some modifications, borrow money from family to get some prototypes made by 3D printing;
  • Finalise the design, access funding via crowdsourcing, have the reels manufactured in China, open a shop on Amazon and a month later go fishing in their 40 foot yacht – they are successful entrepreneurs.

e. The final disruption is the change in Management itself.

Business cannot continue to be managed as it was managed in the past.

There is a new work cohort coming in. These people care about what they work on, they care about who they work with but they do not care about whom they work for.

The idea of hierarchical authority is gone.

But businesses are still operating in a way similar to the governance of the Roman Legions – it is time to move on.

Education and business models have contrived to make workers increasingly more expert about more niches so we are moving towards a world where we have more experts who have more knowledge about less and less, we are moving to a stage where we will have lots of people who know lots about nothing.

A second aspect of the changes in management structures needed in our brave new world are around bureaucracy. A great deal of bureaucracy has been born out of an aspirarion to eliminate variability. Bureaucracy with this goal in mind is a good thing.

But innovation is highly variable – and this is the antithesis of what the business environment has become.

Stikeleather spoke about the role of Chinese companies copying products. These companies operate below the legal constraints of patents and employment contracts. Once again they challenge the old ideas, of banks of lawyers and bureaucracy.

What we need is Problem Solving, Creativity, Innovation.

In conclusion, Stikeleather described our brave new world as a world where

  • Value is transient
  • Value is in the moment
  • Value is contextual.

To be a value creator, you must understand the context.

Stikeleather challenged the audience by saying that the 4P’s of Product, Price, Promotion and Position are no longer valid, since everything is transitional, since value is largely based on the repetitional relationship with the customer.

The Key to the future is people.

Machines can do so much but successful innovation needs people.

There is a need to transform volatility to vision, uncertainty to understanding, complexity to clarity, ambiguity to agility, and then vision, understanding and charity will lead to innovation and ultimately a source of profit.

Stikeleather said that as individuals, we may know something we don’t know we know; but there are many things we don’t know we don’t know. And due to complexity and chaos there are things which are unknowable.

People need a new way of sensing what is going on, and the proposed Executive Breakout from TCD can be instrumental in meeting these challenges. Executives need more than the coping skills of the past.

In response to questions:

Stikeleather said he learned most about innovation from one particular entrepreneurial failure in which he was involved.

He suggested there was a need to champion the idea of Just-in-Time education.

Libraries should be a place of knowledge but also discussion, debate and 3D printers.

He said, Failure is a source of innovation

Innovation is a team sport.

When asked if it was possible to teach innovation, Stikeleather noted that all children are innovators, so the challenge is to unlearn the lack of creativity.

Take away message:

To hold influence, you must be clear on what you want to influence and you must become very focussed and resilient;

The current social and economic climate is a perfect environment for innovation and process innovation is as important as any other type of innovation;

Micro-funding and crowd-sourcing, life without bureaucracy and lawyers, 3D printing and Chinese manufacture are all enablers of innovation.

Failure is a badge of honour.

An interesting, challenging presentation for all those fortunate enough to attend.